The final 2020 presidential debate is happening tonight, Thursday, October 22, at 9pm!

If you’re on the Fairfax campus, stop by the Corner Pocket in The Hub (middle level) to watch the live event with others!

Click here for more info.

Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020

Time: 9-10:30pm (90-minute debate format)

Debate Location: Nashville, TN (hosted by Belmont University)

Moderator: Kristen Welker (NBC News)

On-Campus Watch Location: Corner Pocket, The Hub (Fairfax Campus)

Final Presidential Debate Format:

The format for this debate will be identical to the first presidential debate. The debate will be divided into six segments of approximately 15 minutes each on major topics to be selected by the moderator and announced at least one week before the debate.

The moderator will open each segment with a question, after which each candidate will have two minutes to respond. Candidates will then have an opportunity to respond to each other. The moderator will use the balance of the time in the segment for a deeper discussion of the topic.

All debates will be moderated by a single individual and will run from 9:00-10:30 p.m. Eastern Time without commercial breaks. As always, the moderators alone will select the questions to be asked, which are not known to the CPD or to the candidates. The moderators will have the ability both to extend the segments and to ensure that the candidates have equal speaking time. While the focus will properly be on the candidates, the moderator will regulate the conversation so that thoughtful and substantive exchanges occur.

(format announced on June 23, 2020)

Learn more about The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD): www.debates.org/about-cpd

Are Protests to Blame for Recent Spikes in Violent Crime?

By: Noah Panchure, Mason Votes 2020 Online Editorial Team

On October 15th, we were supposed to witness the second of three planned presidential debates. However, after failed attempt to continue with the event in a virtual format, both candidates set up dueling town hall events at the same time on different networks. While former Vice President Joe Biden participated in a town hall on ABC, President Trump appeared on NBC.

Hosted by “TODAY” anchor Savannah Guthrie, President Trump’s town hall took place outdoors in Miami, Florida, a key battleground state in this year’s election.

TRUMP CONTRACTS COVID-19

The town hall opened up with a discussion of President Trump’s health, as he recently contracted COVID-19. Trump stated that he took Regeneron’s antibody drug, and that he was feeling better just days after he contracted the virus. Guthrie asked about the frequency of his COVID testing routine, but Trump was unsure if he was tested on the day of the debate in Cleveland, Ohio. “Possibly I did, possibly I didn’t. But the doctor has very accurate information,” he said, redirecting Guthrie to his doctors for official records and insisting that he takes “a lot of tests.”

President Trump was also questioned about the so-called “superspreader event” hosted at the White House on September 26th to announce the Supreme Court nomination of Amy Coney Barrett: “I’m President. I have to see people. I can’t be in a basement, I can’t be in a room, I have to be out.” Guthrie responded saying “You can see people with a mask though, right?” President Trump said, “I can, but people with masks are catching it all the time.”

President Trump then referred to Virginia Governor Ralph Northam who “was known for a mask,” but still contracted COVID-19.

The town hall took a turn when Guthrie began pressuring the president on his refusal to offer a clear denunciation of white supremacy during the first debate: “You were asked point blank to denounce white supremacy. In the moment, you didn’t.” During the back and forth Trump finally said, “I denounce white supremacy. Okay?” but Guthrie noted that it took him two days after the debate to clarify his remarks.

TRUMP’S PANDEMIC RESPONSE

The first question from voters attending the town hall event came from Jacqueline Lugo, an Independent who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and was leaning towards voting for Biden. She asked, “If you knew COVID-19 as you told Bob Woodward in February was airborne and deadlier than the flu, why did you only put in place a travel ban from China and not put in place other measures mitigating the spread of COVID-19, potentially saving tens of thousands of American lives.”

Trump responded by stating that he put in the travel ban earlier than instructed by Dr. Fauci and other scientists: “Joe Biden was two months behind me, and he called me xenophobic and racist and everything else, because I put it in. And it turned out that I was 100% right.”

POST-COVID ECONOMY

The second question came from a mother, Barbara, and her daughter. Barbara, leaning Trump, spoke about her experience as a frontline ER doctor who worked throughout the pandemic. She asked about the financial hardships facing the hospitals and its staff, including the economic circumstances: “How are you going to get the U.S. back on track, both in terms of the economy and the pandemic?”

President Trump responded with his performance on the unemployment rates, and the upcoming third quarter numbers that he seemed optimistic about. Trump spoke about COVID-19 again, speaking of how when it came to our country we could have faced even worse including higher unemployment rates. He spoke about having the greatest economy in our country last year, and how he plans for America to return to that economy: “We had the greatest economy we ever had. We had to close it down, we saved two million lives. We’re opening it up. We have a V-shape and it’s coming back. It’s coming back very fast.”

MASKS

Barbara’s daughter, leaning towards Biden, asked a question about the President contracting COVID-19, and if his opinion changed on mask wearing: “No, because I was okay with the masks, I was good with it. But I’ve heard many different stories on masks.”

Trump then referred, for the second time in 30 minutes, to a study he claimed showed “that 85% of the people wearing masks catch it.” Guthrie was quick to correct his interpretation of the study: “I looked at that report, it’s not about mask wearing. It was neutral on the question of masks.”

HEALTH CARE

Cristy, a Republican leaning Trump, asked about his plan to make health care affordable after his repeal and replace plan on Obamacare. She stated that costs of health care have risen, and asked for his plan in 2020. Trump reinforced his stance on protecting people with preexisting conditions, but offered few specifics on how to do so: “The problem with Obamacare, it’s not good. We’d like to terminate it, and we want a much less expensive healthcare that’s a much better healthcare, and that’s where we’re aiming.”

TAXES

Becky voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, however she recently changed her voter registration. As an undecided voter, she asked about taxes: “What do you say to those Americans to tell them why you want the corporate tax rate lower and why that helps them?” President Trump responded by saying, “We have created more jobs than this country has ever created, we are up to 116 million jobs.” He stated that companies are pouring into our nation because of the tax rate, and that Biden’s plan for raising taxes will hurt the American economy.

SCOTUS NOMINATION

Adam, a Democrat supporting Biden, asked President Trump, “What do you say to the voter who thinks it is hypocritical to act in that manner and that they can’t trust Republicans’ word?” President Trump explained his right to appoint a new justice, quoting the late Justice Ginsburg’s comments that president’s are elected for four years, not three: “There’s plenty of time. We’re going to do it before the election, but we also have much time after the election. But there’s no reason to wait, because it’s almost unanimous, it seems to me, certainly within the Republican party.”

ABORTION

Moriah, a pro-life Republican leaning Trump asked, “If Roe v. Wade is ultimately overturned in the future, what protections would be put in place or kept for where the mother’s life is in jeopardy in relation to high risk pregnancies?” President Trump did not give a direct answer, saying that he had not discussed election laws or abortion with any of his nominees: “I think, depending on what happens with Roe v. Wade, I think that perhaps it could get sent down to the states, and the states would decide. I also think perhaps nothing will happen. I have not talked to her about it. I think it would be inappropriate to talk to her about it.”

Guthrie asked Trump for his preference, if he wanted Roe v. Wade to be overturned. The President refused to answer, instead responding that he wanted to see Amy Coney Barrett confirmed to the supreme court and allow the justices to make their own decision: “How she’s going to rule, you’re going to find out perhaps. Or you might not find out. It may never get there.”

POLICE RELATIONSHIPS WITH MINORITIES

Cindy, a Democrat who is leaning towards Biden, spoke about her being the mother of a young male of color: “What will you and your administration do to better prepare our law enforcement officers to work in collaboration with the communities that they serve and also to protect the lives of innocent blacks and latinos from police brutality and injustice?” President Trump related to her, saying that he saw the same things over the summer and how terrible it was to watch. He went on to talk about criminal justice reform, prison reform, HBCU funding and opportunity zones: “I have done more for the African American community than any president. With the exception of Abraham Lincoln.”

IMMIGRATION

The last question came from a Republican named Paulette who is leaning towards voting for Biden: “If you are elected to a second term, do you expect to pursue your previous efforts to cut the DACA program, why or why not?” President Trump said he would, but explained the difference between DACA and Dreamers: “We are going to take care of DACA. We’re going to take care of Dreamer. It’s working right now. We’re negotiating different aspects of immigration and immigration law.”

Click here to read Mason Votes’ coverage of Joe Biden’s “dueling town hall” event.

Are Protests to Blame for Recent Spikes in Violent Crime?

By: Noah Panchure, Mason Votes 2020 Online Editorial Team

There is no doubt that political engagement has increased this year. We have seen citizens from all races, ages, genders, and backgrounds become politically active, especially teenagers and young adults.

It began when COVID-19 reached the United States and shut downs to protect public health took over our lives. Millions across the country were forced to quarantine and cease normal activities.

For months, Americans sat at home with little to do and minimal outside interaction. But the political awakening didn’t stop, and social media allowed young people to connect and express their views despite the pandemic.

Our nation was already experiencing a dark time, but the combination of isolation at home and social issues motivated people to become politically active for the first time.

Ahmaud Arbery was shot and killed in his neighborhood in a non-police altercation in Brunswick, Georgia on February 23rd.

Breonna Taylor was at home in Louisville, Kentucky when she was shot and killed during a police raid that turned violent on March 13th.

George Floyd was killed during an encounter with local law enforcement in Minneapolis, Minnesota on May 25th, sparking social media outrage that led to protests across the country and riots in major cities.

Jacob Blake was shot by police in Kenosha, Wisconsin on August 23rd.

Just days after George Floyd was killed, thousands (eventually millions) took to the streets in a COVID-19 world, protesting and advocating for justice. However, some of the protests led to violence and over 14,000 were arrested.

While around only 7% of the protests turned violent, looting, rioting, and civil disturbance led to an estimated two billion dollars in damages.

Do the protests themselves account for recent spikes in violent crime, or is the “Ferguson Effect,” where police disengage and decrease enforcement as a reaction to community backlash, to blame? And if so, are voters swayed one way or another as a result?

Many have tried to cast violent protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death as the sole cause for increases in murder and assault rates over the summer. This lines up with President Trump’s stance on “law and order,” however it may not have a real connection.

According to a recent Vox article, there may not be actual correlation between the spike in crime and the protests, even the violent ones.

Although President Trump trails in the polls, many suggest that the unrest and violence associated with protesters will be an advantage to him as calls for defunding the police and violence in the streets has the potential to push voters for conservative candidates.

On the other hand, recent events have sparked a national voter registration movement to get as many people registered to vote as possible.

No one knows exactly which social forces will prevail on Election Day, but every American has a chance to voice their opinion by voting on (or before) November 3, 2020.

_____________________________________________________________

Photo by Geoff Livingston/geoliv (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The Vice President and the People

By: Nadia Faour, Mason Votes 2020 Online Editorial Team

With less than three weeks until the election, the Commission on Presidential Debates announced that the second presidential debate was canceled after a failed attempt to continue with the event in a virtual format following Donald Trump’s positive COVID-19 diagnosis earlier this month. In lieu of the originally planned debate featuring both candidates, Joe Biden participated in a solo town hall event in Philadelphia and spoke with potential voters about his plans and policies.

During last week’s “Vice President and the People” town hall moderated by ABC News’ chief anchor George Stephanopoulos, Biden fielded questions from Pennsylvania democrats, republicans, and independents on a wide range of topics from coronavirus response to environmental policy.

Biden dove right into policies his administration would implement if elected, answering the first question about how he would handle the COVID-19 pandemic by emphasizing the importance of mask mandates at local and state levels: “I go to every governor, I go to every mayor, I go to every councilman, I go to every local official, say, mandate the mask.” Biden also explained how he would prioritize preparation for schools and business to be able to better handle the spread of the virus and avoid another economic shut down.

One unanswered question from Biden was a clear stance on court packing. The former vice president addressed this issue by explaining that his stance will depend on what happens in the Senate with the nomination of judge Amy Coney Barrett. It is currently still unknown exactly how the Barrett hearings will resolve, but Biden stated that he will give a clear position on this issue before election day: “They do have a right to know where I stand. And they will have a right to know where I stand before they vote.”

Environmental policy is an issue that many Americans are concerned about and will continue to be a topic of discussion long after this election has come and gone. The vice president’s approach to environmental policy would push for investments in renewable energy sources: “…by the year 2035 we’ll be able to have net zero emissions of carbon from the creation of energy.” Biden said that as president, he would invest $600 billion into “made-in-America” infrastructure that would focus on clean and renewable energy and create good-paying jobs along the way.

Throughout his campaign, Biden has continually insisted that he will not ban fracking and does not endorse all aspects of the Green New Deal. Stephanopoulos pressed Biden on how his plan would not ban fracking but end fossil fuel emissions: “The New Green Deal calls for elimination of all non-renewable energy by 2030. You can’t get there. You’re going to need to be able to transition, George, to be able to transition to get to the place where we invest in new technologies that allow us to do things that get us to a place where we get to net zero emission, including in agriculture. I’ve laid out a detailed plan.”

Throughout the evening Biden stressed his desire to foster unity in the nation under his administration. “I’m running as a proud Democrat, but I’m going to be an American president. I’m going to take care of those that voted against me as well as those who voted for me, for real. That’s what presidents do. We’ve got to heal this nation, because we have the greatest opportunity of any country in the world to own the 21st century. And we can’t do it divided.”

Click here to read Mason Votes’ coverage of Donald Trump’s “dueling town hall” event.

_____________________________________________________________

Biden for President Photo by Adam Schultz (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Day 2 Recap (Tuesday, October 13, 2020)

By: Safiya Khan, Mason Votes 2020 Online Editorial Team

On Tuesday, October 13th, Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett sat for the second day of hearings in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee for over eleven hours, portraying herself as an independent judge lacking an agenda.

Here are some important highlights from day two’s hearings:

Judge Barrett declines to clarify stance on Roe vs. Wade

Similar to previous nominees hearings, Barrett refused to discuss her stance on specific cases citing the “Ginsburg rule.” When asked if she thinks the landmark case Roe vs. Wade should be overturned, she declined to answer. She also emphasized “I’ve made no commitment to anyone about how I would decide any case,” and that she would bring her originality and perspective to the role if confirmed, despite the perception that she shares former Justice Scalia’s opposition to Roe. (In the Rose Garden ceremony announcing Barret’s nomination she praised her mentor Scalia saying, “his judicial philosophy is mine too.”)

Judge Barrett apologizes for her phrasing of LGBTQ+ rights

Judge Barrett used the term “sexual preferences” when describing the LGBTQ community and her stance on the protection of their civil rights. Part of her answer included, “I have no agenda, and I do want to be clear that I have never discriminated on the basis of sexual preference and would not ever discriminate on the basis of sexual preference.”

After Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii stated the term is often used by anti-gay activists to justify their belief that one’s sexual orientation does not require legal protections as they suggest it is a choice, Judge Barrett later apologized for her remarks. She clarified saying, “I certainly did not mean and would never mean to use a term that would cause any offense in the L.G.B.T.Q. community,” Judge Barrett said. “So if I did, I greatly apologize for that.”

Judge Barrett acknowledges the criminal justice system has implicit bias.

When asked how she as an originalist views racism, Judge Barrett stated “it is an entirely uncontroversial and obvious statement” that “racism persists in our country.” When pressed to further elaborate, after being directly asked, “Yes or no question, do you believe that there is implicit racial bias in the criminal justice system?” Judge Barrett acknowledged that with a criminal justice system as large as the United State’s it is unlikely to not have some implicit bias in it.

Senator Harris questions Judge Barrett’s views on reproductive rights and healthcare

The top two Democratic arguments for reproductive rights and healthcare were the center of the proceedings when Senator Kamala Harris asked Judge Barrett for a “yes or no answer” if she was made aware prior to her nomination of President Trump’s promises to nominate judges who would seek to nullify the current healthcare law. In response, Judge Barrett continued her answering pattern stating, “I want to be very, very careful…I’m under oath.”

Letter from Notre Dame faculty members to Barrett requesting she halt her confirmation process

A law professor at Notre Dame, Judge Barrett was questioned about a public letter about 90 of her colleagues wrote to her stating “it is vital that you issue a public statement calling for a halt to your nomination process until after the November presidential election.” and giving three primary reasons. The full letter can be found here.

Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey acknowledged the letter saying, “They wrote an impassioned letter for the sake of our democracy, publicly writing that you withdraw from this nomination process and have it be halted… this is not normal.”

Why is this important?

While Judge Barrett did partially follow the precedent of other nominees, these hearings are a crucial opportunity for the American people to learn about the next potential future Supreme Court Justice and how her appointment directly affects their daily lives. By declining to give clear answers on specific cases such as Roe vs. Wade, The Affordable Care Act, and possible election intervention by the Supreme Court itself (see Bush v Gore), Judge Barrett’s refusal to answer key questions has the potential to impact the integrity of the election in the minds of the American people.

As the election looms closer and closer (just 18 days away), it is becoming more and more apparent just how abnormal this election is.

Read the Mason Votes recap of Day 1 of the Barrett hearings here: masonvotes.gmu.edu/2020/10/14/senate-hearing-for-supreme-court-nominee-amy-coney-barrett/

_____________________________________________________________

Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks (CC PDM 1.0)

Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debate in Utah

By: Nadia Faour, Mason Votes 2020 Online Editorial Team

A lot has changed since September 29th when Trump and Biden faced off in the first presidential debate of the 2020 election. (One Mason student described that event as “the most aggressive presidential debate” they had ever seen).

Just three days after that now-historic debate, President Trump announced that he and First Lady Melania had both tested positive for COVID-19.

Trump’s late night Twitter disclosure prompted many to question the wisdom of hosting subsequent debates as planned, citing potential threats to public health and concerns about the safety of those participating.

The Commission on Presidential Debates has officially cancelled the second presidential debate after a failed attempt to pivot to a virtual format, but the only 2020 Vice Presidential Debate continued as scheduled and in person on Wednesday, October 7th in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Plexiglass dividers, a mask-wearing requirement for all attendees, and a new 12-foot distance requirement between the two candidates on stage all made it impossible for the American people to ignore the novel coronavirus’ association with the White House and the Trump-Pence ticket.

USA Today’s Susan Page served as moderator and addressed the issue within the first few minutes of the debate, asking both candidates to explain how their respective administrations would handle the pandemic.

Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) took the opportunity to discuss what she thinks the Trump administration did wrong in their approach to dealing with the virus, saying that “the American people have witnessed what is the greatest failure of any presidential administration in the history of our country.”

“Harris’ greatest argument was coming for Trump’s record of handling COVID,” said Mason student Carisa Mclaney.

Mike Pence rebutted Harris’ claim, bringing up the success of the president’s travel ban to China early on in the pandemic and accusing democrats of opposing his decisive action: “President Donald Trump has put the health of Americans first.”

Moderator Page emphasized the need for civil discussion early on, but a pattern of Harris criticizing the Trump administration and Pence defending it quickly emerged, with polarizing attacks and subtle hostility on display throughout the 90-minute debate.

Mclaney noted the differences in style between Trump and his running mate: “Pence is more practiced in political speech and remains more reserved, while Trump is more disruptive in a non-professional and rambunctious manner.”

Mason student and secretary of the GMU Republicans student organization, Joe Szymanski, said he thought that the vice presidential debate focused more on “policy instead of personality” by putting key issues on the table, including climate change, healthcare, abortion, and foreign policy.

Something many Americans look for from a vice presidential debate is any potential differences in policy between the presidential candidate and their VP pick.

“For Biden and Harris, there’s quite a number of issues the two don’t fully agree on,” said Mclaney, but “Trump and Pence share a significant number of policy positions, which was bound to have played a part in Pence’s selection as VP.” Szymanski stated that he “doubts there are any” issues that Trump and his VP pick disagree on.

So who won the 2020 VP debate? The answer varies based on who you ask…

Szymanski commented that the debate was “was extremely close. Both really did bring their A game. But I had to give the edge to Vice President Pence. [He] just controlled the messaging a little better.”

Mclaney said, “I think that Kamala won the debate because she’s able to hit back, especially with her one-liners. She was also able to navigate a debate with an interrupting and dismissive man-splainer, one that we as women are too familiar with, with her head held high.”

Another mason student who preferred to remain anonymous agreed that the debate was very close: “I don’t think this debate had a clear winner and loser, both candidates argued their points well and it really came down to policy differences.”

The debate closed with a question from an 8^th grader named Brecklynn who asked: “If our leaders can’t get along, how are the citizens supposed to get along?”

Although this could be viewed as a naïve question from a young person, it was also on the mind of many Mason students contacted during reporting for this article.

One Mason student who requested anonymity summed up the thoughts of many: “[I’m] disappointed by the behavior of both candidates for letting differences get in the way of discussing how to actually help Americans.”

Students describe how they felt after watching Donald Trump and Joe Biden go head-to-head during the debate on Sept. 29

By: Sudiksha Kochi, Fourth Estate Staff Writer

This story was originally published on gmufourthestate.com. Fourth Estate is Mason’s official student-run newspaper.

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and Republican President Donald Trump faced off in the first presidential debate of the 2020 election in Cleveland, Ohio on Sept. 29, with “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace moderating the event. Throughout the debate, the two candidates interrupted each other, bickered on issues beyond the time limit and chaotically exchanged viewpoints. 

The topics addressed included the Supreme Court, the candidates’ records, COVID-19, the economy, the climate and the integrity of the election.

Students watching the debate expressed their opinions on what happened. Global Affairs sophomore Shreya Dandu stated that like many other people, she thought that the debate was a big mess.

“To me, I felt like I was watching two people continuously fight and interrupt each other [rather] than watch[ing] people talk about their agendas,” Dandu said. “All I can remember were the insults and interruptions thrown at each other rather than actual policy proposals.” 

Dandu said that Trump should have stopped interrupting and insulting Biden and Wallace.

“Regardless of who you support, I think that Trump insulting Biden’s sons was just way out of hand,” Dandu said. “There are certain lines you just can’t cross, and I just couldn’t help but think that was extremely unpresidential of him. His outright refusal to denounce white supremacy also speaks volumes to me.”

Dandu said that Biden could have given more concrete answers on his topics.

“While I am planning on voting for him, I noticed he dodged questions about packing the court,” Dandu said. “While I understand he didn’t answer because he doesn’t want to cause more divisions within the Democratic party and that he doesn’t want to alienate voters, I think that people should know where he stands on that issue.”

Health Administration sophomore Nadia Moallin expressed a similar reaction.

“In all honesty, I thought the debate was a complete mess in terms of policy implications, respectability, and everything in-between,” Moallin said. “The entire time I felt overstimulated with jabs coming from both Biden and Trump and even Wallace, that I wasn’t even aware of what the topic was during the conversation. I don’t think this is a left or right issue. In my opinion, there was no way that was informational.”

“It seems as though Trump and Biden were butting heads the entire time to look more superior, that they forgot the main reason they were on stage in the first place,” Moallin said.

While Moallin believes that this election specifically has not changed the nature of politics in the United States, she explained that this election has made voters more aware of the polarization occurring in front of us.

“There is no more looking away and being undecided,” Moallin said. “Most people who were watching the debate were not using the debate as an indicator of who to vote for, most already knew. The more and more polarized American politics become, the less of a chance a middle ground will ever be reached.”

Government and International Politics sophomore Vanessa Gutierrez agreed.

“I think the nature of politics has changed dramatically because the United States has become extremely polarized, and there is evident lack of communication and respect that goes deeper than politics,” Gutierrez said. “More people feel the need to defend their values and beliefs [and] that usually comes out hostile.”

Wallace stated to CNN that he “wishes he had stepped in more seriously sooner” to avoid the fallout.

“That was frustrating,” Wallace stated in a CNN article. “It was frustrating for me because I tried hard to prepare for a serious debate, much more frustrating and more importantly for the American people because they didn’t get the debate they wanted that they deserved.”

Wallace also stated in a CNN article that he believes Trump was the primary cause of the turmoil. According to The Washington Post noted that, Trump repeatedly interrupted Biden and Wallace, attacked Biden’s son Hunter, refused to condemn white supremacy and presented doubts on the legitimacy of the ballots.

“I had baked this beautiful, delicious cake and then frankly the President put his foot in it,” Wallace said to CNN.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

This article appears on Mason Votes with the permission of the editors of Fourth Estate.

Read more from Fourth Estate: gmufourthestate.com

Early and Absentee Voting is Already Underway in Virginia

By: Derek Bowers, Mason Votes 2020 Online Editorial Team

With the November 3rd less than 30 days away, now is the time to make your plan to vote. The state of Virginia offers early voting both in person and through absentee (mail in) ballots.

To register to vote or update your registration, find your local polling place, and apply to vote absentee (by mail) use Citizen Portal: https://vote.elections.virginia.gov/VoterInformation

You can check the location of your local voter registration office here to contact your local election officials: https://vote.elections.virginia.gov/VoterInformation/PublicContactLookup

EARLY VOTING

You are able to vote early in person from now until the Saturday before election day (October 31, 2020). Read our student Guide to Voting for early vote locations and details.

There is no application needed to do this, and you will not be required to provide justification. However, a valid ID is required to be presented at the polling location when casting your vote.

ABSENTEE VOTING (by mail)

Most absentee ballots have already been sent out, as the State mails them 45 days in advance of the election, but you are able to request one until Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5 pm.

To request an absentee ballot, head to the Department of Elections Citizen Portal: https://vote.elections.virginia.gov/VoterInformation.

If you would prefer a paper copy of the absentee ballot form, it is available at this link: https://www.elections.virginia.gov/media/castyourballot/SBE-701-703.1.pdf and can be mailed, faxed, or emailed to the Virginia Department of Elections.

Virginia also requires a proof of valid ID to be submitted with this application or it can be presented when dropping off your absentee ballot at a polling place.

As a reminder, due to court decisions this year all Virginia residents will NOT require a witness signature on their absentee ballot. The state has confirmed that no ballot will be rejected due to a missing witness signature.

CASTING YOUR BALLOT

Absentee ballots can be mailed back by utilizing the prepaid postage on the envelope and dropping it in a USPS mailbox. Ballots can also be dropped in a clearly marked ballot drop box, or can be dropped off on election day at your local polling place by 7:00 PM.

All absentee ballots returned by mail must be postmarked by election day and received by noon within 3 days of the election to be counted.

If you would like to track the status of your ballot, and see when your vote is counted, Virginia offers a ballot tracking link on their elections website: https://ballotscout.org/partners/5a8f1161-23a0-4fa0-8ec9-3e090e97e9b3/va-search

In the case that there are any issues or errors with your absentee ballot, you will be contacted by your local election registrar to make corrections.

TIPS & REMINDERS

Keeping in mind the ever-changing situation with COVID-19, Virginia also offers an emergency absentee ballot in the case that residents, their spouses, children, and/or parents are hospitalized. This must be requested by 2 pm the day before election day (November 2, 2020).

ADA Accessible voting and curbside voting are available as well. The Dept of Elections recommends that you contact your local polling place or election officials to make these arrangements.

As always, mask wearing and social distancing is recommended and may by required if voting or dropping off your ballot in person.

Stay safe and healthy Patriots, and make your voice heard!